Vantsteri Says Boldly: Lab Disinfection is Not Just “Spray and Wipe”: The Right Validation Process
- Addtime: 2025-11-10 / View: 31
In the minds of many lab managers, “disinfection” might seem as simple as spraying some alcohol, wiping down surfaces, and turning on the UV light. However, this is merely “surface cleaning” and falls far short of the microbiological control required in laboratories. True lab disinfection that meets CNAS, USP, and Pharmacopoeia standards requires validation—proving disinfection effectiveness through data.
Today, Vantsteri takes you through this often-overlooked but crucial step.
- Why “Spraying” is Not Enough to Ensure Disinfection
Lab contamination is often not visible dust, but it hides in:
✅ Airflow dead zones, HVAC filter units (FFU)
✅ Gaps on laboratory workbenches, door handles, and pipette bases
✅ Dusty corners, incubator walls, and cracks on the floor
Microorganisms in these areas, particularly spore-forming bacteria, mold spores, and bacteriophages, are resistant to routine alcohol or UV light treatments.
Even more concerning—“localized failure” means the entire contamination risk remains.
- The Core Idea of Disinfection Validation: “Prove Cleanliness with Data”
In international standards:
✅ CNAS-CL01 (17025) requires labs to validate the effectiveness of environmental control methods.
✅ USP <1072> explicitly calls for “Effectiveness Testing” of disinfectants.
✅ The Chinese Pharmacopoeia also mandates that disinfectant validation include neutralization, repeatability, and recovery testing.
Simply put, validation answers the question:
“You claim disinfection is effective, but what evidence do you have?”
- The Correct Lab Disinfection Validation Process
- Define the Validation Scope
This should cover:
✅ Air (aerosolized and settled microorganisms)
✅ Surfaces (benches, floors, walls)
✅ Equipment (incubators, fridges, fume hoods)
✅ HVAC systems (FFU, air return vents)
Each area’s disinfection frequency, dosage, and method should be recorded.
- Choose the Right Disinfectants and Methods
Common combinations:
| Scenario | Recommended Method | Validation Focus |
| General Lab | Alcohol + Quaternary Ammonium Compounds | Repeatability & Coverage |
| Pathogen/Cell Labs | VHP or Sporicidal Agents | Kill Rate Validation |
| Biosafety Labs | VHP or Formaldehyde Fumigation | Uniformity & No Residue |
Vantsteri often uses Vaporized Hydrogen Peroxide (VHP) for high-level disinfection of HVAC systems and surfaces, achieving 6-log kill rates, perfect for higher-tier lab areas.
- Design the Validation Experiments
The validation should include three key tests:
| Test Type | Objective | Method |
| Neutralizer Validation | Confirm that detection isn’t interfered by residual disinfectants | Add disinfectant + neutralizer |
| Kill Efficacy Test | Verify the effectiveness of disinfectants on target microorganisms | Use indicator organisms (e.g., Bacillus subtilis) |
| Environmental Recovery Test | Confirm that the environment returns to a safe level post-disinfection | Surface/Air microbial count measurement |
All data must be recorded, analyzed, and signed off to form a formal validation report.
- Set Up a Periodic Review Plan
Disinfection validation is not a one-time task. Each time disinfectant brands, process parameters, work areas, or equipment layouts change, a re-validation is required.
Additionally, we recommend:
✅ Annual re-validation
✅ Re-validation after sudden contamination events
✅ Re-validation after major equipment cleaning or repairs
- Validation Standards
According to USP and the Pharmacopoeia:
✅ Kill rate ≥99.9999% (6-log)
✅ Surface sampling pass rate ≥95%
✅ No microbial growth recovery
The data must support the conclusion that the space is either sterile or controlled.
- Vantsteri’s Hands-On Validation Experience
Vantsteri has developed a mature disinfection validation system through multiple lab and pharmaceutical projects:
Typical Case:
✅ Project: Pharmaceutical QC Lab
✅ Method: VHP space disinfection + surface sampling verification
✅ Result: Bacillus subtilis indicator plates showed no colony growth after three tests
✅ Report: CNAS-format validation report + disinfection logs + calibration traceability tables
✅ Outcome: Environmental microbial load decreased by 6-log, lab air quality reached ISO 7 level.
- Conclusion: From “Experience-Based” to “Data-Driven” Validation
Lab disinfection is not just a “spray and wipe” task but a comprehensive, scientifically validated process. Only when each disinfection can “speak through data” will the lab environment be truly controllable and reliable.
In the world of microbial contamination control, validation is the bottom line, and standards are the respect.
